viernes, 16 de julio de 2010
El circo de terror del modo de entender belleza con artificialidad de por medio.
jueves, 15 de julio de 2010
Por esto los gringos son odiados y repudiados en el mundo, por imbeciles y egocentricos: 73% se oponen a que Obama prohiba exploración petrolera
Estos imbeciles no aprenden nada, ni aun teniendo el 9/11 como ejemplo de un mal juicio entienden.
Americans in 73% Majority Oppose Deepwater Drilling Ban - Bloomberg: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"
miércoles, 14 de julio de 2010
Guanajuato clama le mienten la madre una vez más: Condenan uso de tatuajes en mujeres
Mas aun asi como pintarse el cabello buscando "ser" rubia este tipo de alteraciones al cuerpo humano se me hacen dignas de vómito, una torcedura de la mente, el ego y un desvarío del respeto personal.
Sin embargo, bueno, ya hay gente que lo hace, ni hablar, pero ahora sale esta mujer en guanajuato condenando lso tatuajes pero nótese: particularmente en mujeres, además de corta de vista machísta la hija de su...
Pero he de reconocer que hasta cierto punto la apoyo, sin embargo su postura machista es la que escupo y piso: los tatuajes son abominables (asi como los lucen) en hombres y mujeres.
http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/695220.html
La directora del Instituto de la Mujer Guanajuatense (IMUG), Luz María Ramírez Villalplando, señaló que el uso de tatuajes en las mujeres es un ejemplo de la pérdida de valores en la sociedad.
En una exposición a unos 200 políticos en el Comité Municipal del Partido Acción Nacional (PAN), la funcionaria rechazó los grabados en la piel, las perforaciones y utilización de piercing en los genitales.
Idioteces de los sistemas de salud: En México es la gordura y no el cigarro el principal problema de salud
75% de camas de hospital, a obesidadGDF: El sistema de salud colapsa por la epidemia de sobrepesoCiudad de México | Miércoles 14 de julio de 2010
Phenélope Aldaz | El Universal
La ciudad de México está por arriba del promedio nacional en materia de obesidad y sobrepeso, de acuerdo con cifras de la Secretaría de Salud del Distrito Federal que revelan que en los hospitales públicos tres de cada cuatro camas están ocupadas por personas que padecen alguna enfermedad detonada por estos padecimientos.
A nivel nacional, 72% de las mujeres mayores de 20 años tiene obesidad o sobrepeso; en el DF, la cifra alcanza 75.4%, es decir, 2.3 millones de personas.
En el sector masculino, a nivel nacional el porcentaje es de 66%; en el DF, 69.8%, lo que representa 1.8 millones de personas.
Al inaugurar un gimnasio en la Secretaría de Finanzas capitalina, como parte del programa Muévete y Ponte en Cintura en la Oficina, Armando Ahued, secretario de Salud capitalino, consideró urgente desarrollar políticas públicas para combatir este problema.
"Es necesario iniciar medidas. Quizás en cinco o 10 años el sistema de salud público puede colapsar por la cantidad de enfermos que vamos a tener", advirtió el funcionario.
"No queremos más obesos mórbidos en la clínica de bariatría, con 130 y hasta 200 kilogramos de peso. Es muy lamentable que la gente esté poniendo en riesgo su vida", precisó.
Ahued indicó que uno de los sectores más afectados por la obesidad es el infantil, que reporta casos de diabetes en pequeños de entre 11 y 13 años.
Mario Delgado, secretario de Finanzas de la ciudad de México, también alertó: "Tenemos más de 5 millones de niños que tienen sobrepeso".
Delgado añadió que lo grave es la inversión que se otorga a las enfermedades crónico-degenerativas y el número de muertes que ocasiona. "Cada hora mueren cinco personas por este tipo de enfermedades".
En marzo pasado, el gobierno federal, en voz del secretario de Salud, José Ángel Córdova Villalobos, advirtió que el sistema de salud del país puede colapsar en las próximas dos décadas por los crecientes costos para atender enfermedades relacionadas con la obesidad
y el sobrepeso.
Datos federales indican que de 2000 a 2008 se elevó 60% la atención de enfermedades relacionadas con dichos padecimientos, al pasar de 26 mil millones de pesos a más de 40 mil millones, lo que equivale a lo invertido en el Seguro Popular durante 2009.
lunes, 12 de julio de 2010
Las víctimas de Laguna Verde, el reactor/bomba de tiempo nuclear mexicano
- vengador49 dijo...
- Es verdad un querido profesor de FES Zaragoza, murio por radiaciones de Radio, muchos mas han muerto, muchos mas moriran en esa planta, no hay responsables, no hay quien la detenga, esos los que no la detienen deberian morir radiados, para que no hubiera mas quien quiera que esa planta no cierre, pero que mas da mientras sea fuente de trabajo de futuros cadaveres, habra quien no desida cerrar, ya basta de tanta idiotes, laguna verde debe cerrar.
- 11 de julio de 2010 14:35
- vengador49 dijo...
- En Memoria de Dr. Carlos Morales, profesor de quimica organica de FES ZARAGOZA UNAM y Egresado de Prepa 5.
sábado, 3 de julio de 2010
Estupidez y cacería de brujas siglo XXI en Alemania
viernes, 2 de julio de 2010
{climate justice now!] BP and geoengineering: the ecologist
http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/commentators/other_comments/522729/the_link_between_bp_geoengineering_and_gm.html
The link between BP, geoengineering and GM
Jim Thomas
28th June, 2010
BP won't stop at dangerous deep water drilling: the company is bent on still more dangerous projects, including genetic modification and hacking the planet's atmosphere...
Sometimes you have to notice the silences. Where has Dr. Steve Koonin, Under Secretary for Science at the US Department of Energy, been since the Gulf disaster happened?
Koonin was intimately acquainted with the very technologies that have failed so spectacularly on the Deepwater Horizon rig in his former job as BP's chief scientist. While his current employer, Barack Obama is trying to figure out 'whose ass to kick' over the spill, he might find it instructive to zip back to a presentation by Koonin at MIT in 2005, in which we see Koonin-as-oilman boasting of his company's technological prowess in taking oil exploration and production into the ultra deep waters of the gulf.
In particular, he says that $50 million to bore a hole in the gulf's seabed will yield a million barrels a day, describing the technical challenges of depth and pressure. A small note on the bottom of his slide reads 'marine environment creates integrity challenges' - engineering-speak for 'accidents likely'.
Known unknowns
Did senior management at BP such as Koonin know that they were pushing the bounds of environmental safety in deploying these ultra-deep water-drilling technologies? Of course they did. But as Koonin's MIT presentation makes clear, stretching technological boundaries into risky areas is how BP navigates in an era of peak oil. Koonin's much lauded role at BP was precisely to apply cutting-edge science to the problem of declining oil reserves and growing climate crisis. Koonin led a team of researchers that would allow for the more economical extraction of hard-to-get oil (e.g. tar sands, deep water drilling).
More significantly, Koonin took a central role in sinking millions of dollars of investment by BP into the new field of extreme genetic engineering known as synthetic biology, where entrepreneurs are building the DNA of entirely novel microbes from scratch in order convert sugar plantations, corn fields and forests into biofuels to keep the car economy gassed up.
It was under Koonin's tenure at BP that the oil giant invested an undisclosed sum into Craig Venter's Synthetic Genomics Inc to develop microbes that could be injected into coal seams and tar sands to release methane. Such methanogenic bacteria exists naturally in parts of the Earth's crust but the ecological implications of artificially injecting super powerful methane-creating bugs and the potential for an accidental release of powerful greenhouse gas into the atmosphere has yet to be studied. Of course BP would counter that their experimental technology would not escape, just like hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil was not expected to gush out of the seabed.
Synthetic organisms
Just over a month ago, Venter announced the 'birth' of Synthia, the first artificial self-reproducing organism, thereby stimulating further investment in the controversial field and attracting many calls for more regulation and oversight of these new technologies. If we have learnt one thing out of the BP-Halliburton-Transocean disaster it is this: do not trust those who are profiting from the use of a technology with its safety.
And then there is geo-engineering –the biggest technological gamble of all --which Koonin and BP see as a viable backup plan. Geoengineering refers to seemingly outlandish large-scale schemes to re-engineer atmospheric and ocean systems in order to counteract global warming. Like the massive, improbable-sounding concrete caps, nuclear options and 'top kill' plans now being played out on the deepwater horizon well head, such schemes have a boyish sci-fi feel to them – dumping iron in the ocean to prompt plankton blooms that would gobble up C02 or whitening clouds to reflect sunlight back to space.
A Plan B for the world
In 2008 David Eyton, BP VP for science and technology announced that a new area of investigation for BP was indeed geo-engineering. 'We cannot ignore the scale of the challenge,' he wrote ,'and we all need to have a plan B if the world is unable to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations and the worst of climate change predictions are realized.'
BP's preferred option is a proposal to shoot sulphur particles into the upper atmosphere to mimic the effect of a volcanic plume. In the case of a large volcanic eruption (such as Pinatubo in 1991) such particles reflect sunlight back to space and significantly reduce the Earth's temperature.
Steve Koonin convened a fraternity of a dozen scientists for a week last year in order to look in detail at the technical research agenda of short-wave climate engineering, through the use of stratospheric aerosols. The study was the first to be sponsored by NOVIM, an outfit that claims to 'provide clear scientific options to the most urgent problems… without advocacy or agenda'.
The report outlines a decade-long research programme that begins with computers in the lab, and then moves to field experiments to 'monitored deployment'. The specific goal of the report is to devise a research agenda that will 'diminish risk and uncertainty'.
Of course, what constitutes an acceptable risk when referring to the Earth's complex, fragile and already out-of-whack climatic systems should be a political, not a mere technical, question. Oil executives and fishermen are unlikely to respond in the same way. Governments and peoples from the Northern and Southern hemispheres are also likely to disagree. Women and men have also been shown to differ on attitudes to risk.
Just as the oil industry is eager to get on with the exploitation of hard-to-reach sources of black gold, an increasingly vocal and well-organised lobby of geoengineers is anxious to get on with testing a variety of climate intervention schemes. Underlying both is a thinly disguised hubris that the Gulf catastrophe should vividly awake us to. Both oil and geoengineering have strong connections in Washington, sometimes even in the same people. To state the obvious, big oil would certainly benefit if the atmosphere could be engineered to withstand higher concentrations of greenhouse gases.
A growing group of citizens are calling for a halt to such experimentation on planet Earth (see www.handsoffmotherearth.org) and the expanding thick black muck in the Gulf should remind us all to listen to them. It is too late to prevent this disaster; not too late to prevent others.
Jim Thomas is research programme manager at the ETC group
--
Miguel Valencia
ECOMUNIDADES