Estupidez, fanatismo religioso, prepotencia y demencia de los judíos radicales en el West Bank

The World Today - Anger over Palestinian prisoner swap escalates 03/11/2011

Tras cortesmente haberles devuelto a su soldadete judío a cambio de 500 prisioneros palestinos, que sabemos es dudoso su grado de culpabilidad, ahora los nauseabundos judíos radicales del West Bank, asentamiento ilegal que a pesar de ser prohibido y amenaza descarrilar cualquier proceso de paz y que es incentivado por el putrefacto gobierno israelí, han lanzado una iniciativa de estupida magnitud talmudica en poner precio a las cabezas de los palestinos liberados y asesinarlos. El dinero para tales actos, que no es poco, no dudo se financíe internacionalmente con el judío internacional que lucra donde sea y manda dinero a su terruño polvoriento y estéril, así como hasta en México tuvimos a Moisés Saba ya muerto, financiador de radicales judíos en Israel. El día que no haya radicales el mundo será un mejor lugar.

Sumen a eso que también andan ahora de calientes - nuevamente - por atacar a Irán e Israel no es más que una bacinica sobre la cual se antoja vomitar.

Esto era obvio: las motivaciones detrás de la "revolución" libia

La basura del modelito anglosajón, es decir EUA e Inglaterra ayudado por algunos esquiroles de la UE

New Scientist revela la identidad de la plutocracia bancaria (1%) que controla al mundo (99%)

Alfredo Jalife nos aporta estos datos...

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/10/23/opinion/016o1pol


New Scientist revela la identidad de la plutocracia bancaria (uno por ciento ) que controla al mundo (99 por ciento).

Andy Coghlan y Debora MacKenzie, de la revista científica New Scientist (19/10/11) revelan “la red capitalista que gobierna el mundo”, basados en una investigación de tres teóricos de los “sistemas complejos” –Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder y Stefano Battiston– del Instituto Federal de Tecnología Suizo, con sede en Zurich.

Coghlan y MacKenzie aducen que “la ciencia ha confirmado los peores temores” de los contestatarios indignados en todo el mundo (ver Bajo la Lupa, 16/10/11): “Un análisis de las relaciones entre 43 mil trasnacionales ha identificado un relativamente reducido grupo de empresas, principalmente bancos (¡supersic!), con un poder desproporcionado sobre la economía global”.

Se confirma también nuestro axioma añejo sobre el supremo poder que ejerce la bancocracia, quintaesencia de la parasitaria plutocracia global.

Los investigadores suizos extrajeron de ORBIS 2007 –base de datos que lista 37 millones de empresas e inversionistas en el mundo– los datos de 43 mil 60 trasnacionales y la participación propietaria que las vincula entre sí, con lo que “construyeron un modelo que expone a las empresas que controlan a otras mediante redes de acciones en común, acoplado a los ingresos operativos de la empresa” que revela “el mapa de la estructura del poder económico”.

El notable hallazgo, que será publicado de manera formal en PLoS ONE –publicación científica de Public Library of Science–, reveló un núcleo de mil 318 empresas con propiedad accionaria entrelazada; cada una estaba ligada en promedio con otras 20.

Coghlan y MacKenzie explayan que “aunque las mil 318 empresas representan 20 por ciento de los ingresos operativos globales, son dueñas en forma colectiva mediante sus acciones en la mayoría de las empresas estelares (bluechips) y manufactureras del mundo –es decir, la economía “real”– que representa 60 por ciento adicional de los ingresos globales”. ¡Son las dueñas “invisibles” del mundo gracias a la conectividad de redes financieras!

Cuando los investigadores profundizaron y desenmarañaron la red propietaria, encontraron que ésta llevaba a una “superentidad” de “147 empresas aún más estrechamente conectadas –cuya propiedad total está controlada por otros miembros de la superentidad– que controlan 40 por ciento de la riqueza total de la red”, es decir, “menos de uno por ciento (¡extrasupersic!) de las empresas controlan 40 por ciento de la red entera”, cuya “mayoría son instituciones financieras”.

Entre las 20 primeras destacan el banco británico Barclays, y los bancos estadunidenses JPMorgan Chase & Co, y el Grupo Goldman Sachs.

Los expertos suizos consideran que se trata de “la primera investigación científica de la arquitectura de la red de propiedad internacional y la computación del control que detenta cada jugador global” en la que encontraron que un diminuto número de instituciones financieras forma “una superentidad”. Una de las consecuencias de su asombroso hallazgo es que “la estructura del control de la red de las trasnacionales afecta la competencia global de los mercados y la estabilidad financiera”.

Para los autores suizos “es fundamental entender el funcionamiento de la economía mundial” y su “implicación en la estabilidad financiera global” cuando “las instituciones financieras establecen entre sí vinculantes contratos financieros, como los empréstitos con los derivados, con varias otras instituciones” lo cual “les permite diversificar el riesgo pero al mismo tiempo les expone al contagio”.


Debido a su transcendencia vale la pena señalar a “las primeras 50 empresas” de las 147 firmas “superconectadas”:

1) Barclays PLC; 2) Capital Group Companies Inc; 3) FMR Corporation; 4) AXA; 5) State Street Corporation; 6) JP Morgan Chase & Co; 7) Legal & General Group PLC; 8) Vanguard Group Inc; 9) UBS AG; 10) Merrill Lynch & Co Inc; 11) Wellington Management Co LLP; 12) Deutsche Bank AG; 13) Franklin Resources Inc; 14) Credit Suisse Group; 15) Walton Enterprises LLC; 16) Bank of New York Mellon Corp; 17) Natixis; 18) Goldman Sachs Group Inc; 19) T Rowe Price Group Inc; 20) Legg Mason Inc; 21) Morgan Stanley; 22) Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc; 23) Northern Trust Corporation; 24. Société Générale; 25) Bank of America Corporation; 26) Lloyds TSB Group PLC; 27) Invesco PLC; 28) Allianz SE; 29) TIAA; 30) Old Mutual Public Limited Company; 31) Aviva PLC; 32) Schroders PLC; 33) Dodge & Cox; 34) Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc; 35) Sun Life Financial Inc; 36) Standard Life PLC; 37) CNCE; 38) Nomura Holdings Inc; 39) The Depository Trust Company; 40) Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance; 41) ING Groep NV; 42) Brandes Investment Partners LP; 43) Unicredito Italiano SPA; 44) Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan; 45) Vereniging Aegon; 46) BNP Paribas; 47) Affiliated Managers Group Inc; 48) Resona Holdings Inc; 49) Capital Group International Inc, y 50) China Petrochemical Group Company.

De este núcleo supercompacto, 24 (¡supersic!) empresas pertenecen a EU, ocho a Gran Bretaña, cinco a Francia, cuatro a Japón, tres a Alemania, dos a Holanda, dos a Suiza, una a Italia, y una a China (la 50). De ellas, 44 son entidades financieras: ¡88 por ciento!

Se consolida así el teorema de que la dupla anglosajona controla el mundo financiero, en su quintaesencia centralbanquista monetarista que hemos denominado la bancocracia global –que a su vez domina la economía “real” cuando la clase política está totalmente ausente, para no decir que ha sido excesivamente lubricada–, al unísono de algunas entidades que sobreviven del G-7 (Francia, Japón y Alemania) –extensivo al G-10 (Suiza y Holanda)–, mientras apenas irrumpe China de parte de los BRICS (Brasil, Rusia, India, China y Sudáfrica), quienes exhiben su dramática vulnerabilidad, no se diga la patética miseria de Latinoamérica, África, el mundo islámico y el mundo árabe.

Por lo menos es saludable conocer cuál es la “superentidad” financierista que ha impuesto su dictadura global, la bancocracia, en su quintaesencia anglosajona.

Un enfoque zoom (literal) devela la circularidad “superconectada” de las principales 18 trasnacionales del sector financiero al momento del arranque del análisis (2007: un año antes al estallido de la grave crisis financiera global): Prudential Financial, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Bank of America Corp., State Street Corp., Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, T Rowe Price, UBS AG, Deutsche Bank, Credit Swiss, Commerzbank, Franklin Resource, Barclays PLC, JP Morgan Chase &Co., Merril Lynch y Axa.

Cuatro años después algunas de estas entidades financieras, en su mayoría anglosajonas, han quebrado (Lehman Brothers) o se han fusionado (Bear Stearns, adquirida por el gigante de los “derivados financieros” JP Morgan Chase) o están al borde de la insolvencia (Bank of America y Citigroup) y, más que nada, han colocado al mundo al borde del precipicio debido a su maligna superconectividad totalmente desregulada.

El diagnóstico de la patología que asuela al mundo está hecho; falta la terapéutica liberadora.

La Jornada: Llevará el actual sistema de pensiones a un país de viejos pobres: expertos

Con la marcada injusticia e inequidad social en México no nos extrañen los cánceres desde la delincuencia de cualqueir tipo hasta el puesto ambulante, venta informal, piratería, la desesperanza prospectiva es la que nos tiene como estamos.

La Jornada: Llevará el actual sistema de pensiones a un país de viejos pobres: expertos

Gaddaffi muerto: se rinde y pide que no disparen pero aún así lo asesinan.

¿Y no es asesinato matar aunque sea un dictador según las leyecitas y moralinas occidentales que armaron a la gente y tumbaron a Khadafi "desinteresadamente" solo con el hambre de justicia ? ¿Irán a juicio ? Bueno, Osama Bin Laden también fué asesinado y no tenía armas ni puso defensa al parecer...Por eso me río de los veredictos de la historia y más de quienes los creen.

Aquí una nota de Bild confirma que gadaffi pidió que no dispararan. 

http://www.bild.de/politik/ausland/libyen-krise/libyen-muammar-gaddafi-tot-20555392.bild.html

No defiendo a Gadaffi que esto y peores cosas ha de haber hecho señalo y desenmascaro de nuevo la nause a de la moralina occidental y judía.

Explosión del volcán Yellowstone

El artículo describe la mega erupción que sucedió hace 100,000 años. Pero consideren que este volcán está vivo y tiene un potencial a que de volver a erupcionar oacaría todo el hemisferio norte con sus cenizas es un monstruo.

Yellowstone-Super-Eruption - Vulkanausbruch - PM Online

Del soldadito judío por 1027 palestinos.

Historias a lo Hollywwod que repatean: Los medios se la pasan ovacionando, elogiando alabando que un prisionero militar (asesino) judío fué liberado por los palestinos tras 5 años de cautiverio PERO NADIE nos dice ¿Cuanto tiempo estuvieron encerrados los 1027 palestinos intercambiados por el soldadito? ¿Qué pruebas reales tuvieron contra esos palestinos? ¿Qué edades tienen? ¿Qué tratos recibieron?

La fuerza aérea de E.U. hace peculiares cambios auna página web de indicaciones sobre OVNIS

Air Force UFO Rules Vanish After Huffington Post Inquiry: - Sent using Google Toolbar

Como trabaja el lobby judío-sionista-israelí

Esta es la democracia del mejor postor: Video Censurado por Televisa,TV Azteca y Gobernacion (Mexico)

Ola de protestas contra la codicia empresarial recorre el mundo

Este tipo de protestas ya algunos como Gerald Celente las habían ya previsto hace uno tiempo.

• En lo que fue señalado como el inicio del siglo XXI, en 951 ciudades de 82 naciones millones salieron a gritar su descontento
• El repudio fue llevado a los sitios simbólicos del capital
• Es la culminación de nuestro sueño, dice el fundador de Wikileaks

 http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/10/16/politica/002n1pol

Y hace tiempo comentaba, hace años, que así como iban las cosas ya no hay países, si acaso naciones debilmente definidas, borradas de la mano de intereses para que surgiera solo la época de una especie de clase social mundial del siervo global, con sus respectivos amos globales que cuando desean más o expandirse usan y manipulan a sus "libres" siervos para justificar actos que nada tienen que ver con ellos pero sí con los intereses de sus amos, siervos globales que son enfrentados y después llevados librar las guerras para que después de ello solo sean engranes de fábrica, oficinita o engranes de la máquina de consumo, siervos globales al final de cuentas sirviendo a sus amos globales.

Werner Sobek: La sustentabilidad es solo un resultado paralelo al buen diseño

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/post/german-architect-werner-sobek-sustainability--it-just-is-a-byproduct-of-good-design/2011/09/13/gIQAZ58y1K_blog.html

German architect Werner Sobek grew up in Swabia, a region in southern Germany where sustainability meant survival.
“It was a poor area until car companies came in and made it rich. People had to import everything – steel, coal, metal,” Werner said. “You did not throw anything away.”
That is the mentality Sobek pitched in his presentation at the Goethe Institut Thursday as part of Architecture Week D.C. 2011. The week-long series of events, hosted by the American Institute of Architects, highlighted not only the tradition of architecture in D.C., but also creative, energy-efficient alternatives to futuristic architecture.
However, according to Sobek, who has designed structures for Mercedes Benz and the Sachsenhausen concentration camp memorial, energy-efficiency is not his primary objective.
“You have to look at more than safe energy for one lifetime,” he said. “Sustainability – it just is a byproduct of good design.”
The rigorous recycling standards for German auto manufacturers known for good design inspired Sobek to challenge himself to do the same. The result was a 100-percent recyclable house in Stuttgart – his home since 2000.

¿Por qué dictadores y tiranso se aferran hasta el final?

Y yo creo que aplica no solo a personas sino a sistemas completos como el sistema político-gendarme mundial de Estados Unidos o el estado teocrático de Israel.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/the-truth-behind-bravado-in-a-bunker-2351228.html

Terremoto en Fukushima, Japón: Explosión de reactor nuclear. ¿Preparaba Japón aramas nucleares ahí ayudado por E.U.A. e Israel ?

Más de www.rense.com

Secret US-Israeli Nuke Transfers
Led To Fukushima Blasts
By Yoichi Shimatsu

A Rense World Exclusive

Copyright 2011 - All Rights Reserved
10-2-11

Sixteen tons and what you get is a nuclear catastrophe. The explosions that rocked the Fukushima No.1 nuclear plant were more powerful than the combustion of hydrogen gas, as claimed by the Tokyo Electric Power Company. The actual cause of the blasts, according to intelligence sources in Washington, was nuclear fission of. warhead cores illegally taken from America's sole nuclear-weapons assembly facility. Evaporation in the cooling pools used for spent fuel rods led to the detonation of stored weapons-grade plutonium and uranium. The facts about clandestine American and Israeli support for Japan's nuclear armament are being suppressed in the biggest official cover-up in recent history. The timeline of events indicates the theft from America's strategic arsenal was authorized at the highest level under a three-way deal between the Bush-Cheney team, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Elhud Olmert's government in Tel Aviv. Tokyo's Strangelove In early 2007, Vice President Dick Cheney flew to Tokyo with his closest aides. Newspaper editorials noted the secrecy surrounding his visit - no press conferences, no handshakes with ordinary folks and, as diplomatic cables suggest, no briefing for U.S. Embassy staffers in Tokyo. Cheney snubbed Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma, who was shut out of confidential talks. The pretext was his criticism of President George Bush for claiming Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. The more immediate concern was that the defense minister might disclose bilateral secrets to the Pentagon. The Joint Chiefs of Staff were sure to oppose White House approval of Japan's nuclear program. An unannounced reason for Cheney's visit was to promote a quadrilateral alliance in the Asia-Pacific region. The four cornerstones - the US, Japan, Australia and India - were being called on to contain and confront China and its allies North Korea and Russia.. From a Japanese perspective, this grand alliance was flawed by asymmetry: The three adversaries were nuclear powers, while the U.S. was the only one in the Quad group. To further his own nuclear ambitions, Abe was playing the Russian card. As mentioned in a U.S. Embassy cable (dated 9/22), the Yomiuri Shimbun gave top play to this challenge to the White House : "It was learned yesterday that the government and domestic utility companies have entered final talks with Russia in order to relegate uranium enrichment for use at nuclear power facilities to Atomprom, the state-owned nuclear monopoly." If Washington refused to accept a nuclear-armed Japan, Tokyo would turn to Moscow. Since the Liberal Democratic Party selected him as prime minister in September 2006, the hawkish Abe repeatedly called for Japan to move beyond the postwar formula of a strictly defensive posture and non-nuclear principles. Advocacy of a nuclear-armed Japan arose from his family tradition. His grandfather Nobusuke Kishi nurtured the wartime atomic bomb project and, as postwar prime minister, enacted the civilian nuclear program. His father Shintaro Abe, a former foreign minister, had played the Russian card in the 1980s, sponsoring the Russo-Japan College, run by the Aum Shinrikyo sect (a front for foreign intelligence), to recruit weapons scientists from a collapsing Soviet Union. The chief obstacle to American acceptance of a nuclear-armed Japan was the Pentagon, where Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima remain as iconic symbols justifying American military supremacy.The only feasible channel for bilateral transfers then was through the civilian-run Department of Energy (DoE), which supervises the production of nuclear weapons. Camp David Go-Ahead The deal was sealed on Abe's subsequent visit to Washington. Wary of the eavesdropping that led to Richard Nixon's fall from grace, Bush preferred the privacy afforded at Camp David. There, in a rustic lodge on April 27, Bush and Abe huddled for 45 minutes. What transpired has never been revealed, not even in vague outline. As his Russian card suggested, Abe was shopping for enriched uranium. At 99.9 percent purity, American-made uranium and plutonium is the world's finest nuclear material. The lack of mineral contaminants means that it cannot be traced back to its origin. In contrast, material from Chinese and Russian labs can be identified by impurities introduced during the enrichment process. Abe has wide knowledge of esoteric technologies. His first job in the early 1980s was as a manager at Kobe Steel. One of the researchers there was astrophysicist Hideo Murai, who adapted Soviet electromagnetic technology to "cold mold" steel. Murai later became chief scientist for the Aum Shinrikyo sect, which recruited Soviet weapons technicians under the program initiated by Abe's father. After entering government service, Abe was posted to the U.S. branch of JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization). Its New York offices hosted computers used to crack databases at the Pentagon and major defense contractors to pilfer advanced technology. The hacker team was led by Tokyo University's top gamer, who had been recruited into Aum. After the Tokyo subway gassing in 1995, Abe distanced himself from his father's Frankenstein cult with a publics-relations campaign. Fast forward a dozen years and Abe is at Camp David. After the successful talks with Bush, Abe flew to India to sell Cheney's quadrilateral pact to a Delhi skeptical about a new Cold War. Presumably, Cheney fulfilled his end of the deal. Soon thereafter Hurricane Katrina struck, wiping away the Abe visit from the public memory. The Texas Job BWXT Pantex, America's nuclear warhead facility, sprawls over 16,000 acres of the Texas Panhandle outside Amarillo. Run by the DoE and Babcock & Wilson, the site also serves as a storage facility for warheads past their expiration date. The 1989 shutdown of Rocky Flats, under community pressure in Colorado, forced the removal of those nuclear stockpiles to Pantex. Security clearances are required to enter since it is an obvious target for would-be nuclear thieves. In June 2004, a server at the Albuquerque office of the National Nuclear Security System was hacked. Personal information and security-clearance data for 11 federal employees and 177 contractors at Pantex were lifted. NNSA did not inform Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman or his deputy Clay Sell until three months after the security breach, indicating investigators suspected an inside job. While Bush and Abe met at Camp David, 500 unionized security guards at Pantex launched a 45-day strike. Scabs were hired, but many failed to pass the entry exam, according to the Inspector General's office at DoE. The IG report cited witnesses who said: "BWXT officials gave passing grades to some replacement guards even though they actually flunked tests," and "contractor officials gave correct answers to those that failed the tests." Although the scene was nearly as comical as the heist in "Ocean's Eleven", Pantex is not some Vegas casino. At stake was nuclear Armageddon. At an opportune moment during the two-month strike, trucks loaded with warhead cores rolled out of the gates. Some 16 metric tons of nuclear cores packed in caskets were hauled away in refrigerated containers to prevent fission. At the port of Houston, the dangerous cargo was loaded aboard vessels operated by an Israeli state-owned shipping line. The radioactive material was detected by port inspector Roland Carnaby, a private contractor working under the federal program to interdict weapons of mass destruction. The intelligence community is still buzzing about his shooting death. On April 29, 2008, Houston police officers pursued Carnaby on a highway chase and gunned him down. His port monitoring contract was later awarded to the Israel-based security firm NICE (Neptune Intelligence Computer Engineering), owned by former Israeli Defense Force officers. Throughout the Pantex caper, from the data theft to smuggling operation, Bush and Cheney's point man for nuclear issues was DoE Deputy Director Clay Sell, a lawyer born in Amarillo and former aide to Panhandle district Congressman Mac Thornberry. Sell served on the Bush-Cheney transition team and became the top adviser to the President on nuclear issues. At DoE, Sell was directly in charge of the U.S. nuclear weapons complex, which includes 17 national laboratories and the Pantex plant. (Another alarm bell: Sell was also staff director for the Senate Energy subcommittee under the late Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, who died in a 2010 plane crash.) An Israeli Double-Cross The nuclear shipments to Japan required a third-party cutout for plausible deniability by the White House. Israel acted less like an agent and more like a broker in demanding additional payment from Tokyo, according to intelligence sources. Adding injury to insult, the Israelis skimmed off the newer warhead cores for their own arsenal and delivered older ones. Since deteriorated cores require enrichment, the Japanese were furious and demanded a refund, which the Israelis refused. Tokyo had no recourse since by late 2008 principals Abe had resigned the previous autumn and Bush was a lame duck. The Japanese nuclear developers, under the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, had no choice but to enrich the uranium cores at Fukushima No.1, a location remote enough to evade detection by nonproliferation inspectors. Hitachi and GE had developed a laser extraction process for plutonium, which requires vast amounts of electrical power. This meant one reactor had to make unscheduled runs, as was the case when the March earthquake struck. Tokyo dealt a slap on the wrist to Tel Aviv by backing Palestinian rights at the UN. Not to be bullied, the Israeli secret service launched the Stuxnet virus against Japan's nuclear facilities. Firewalls kept Stuxnet at bay until the Tohoku earthquake. The seismic activity felled an electricity tower behind Reactor 6. The power cut disrupted the control system, momentarily taking down the firewall. As the computer came online again, Stuxnet infiltrated to shut down the back-up generators. During the 20-minute interval between quake and tsunami, the pumps and valves at Fukushima No.1 were immobilized, exposing the turbine rooms to flood damage. The flow of coolant water into the storage pools ceased, quickening evaporation. Fission of the overheated cores led to blasts and mushroom-clouds. Residents in mountaintop Iitate village overlooking the seaside plant saw plumes of smoke and could "taste the metal" in their throats. Guilty as Charged The Tohoku earthquake and tsunami were powerful enough to damage Fukushima No.1. The natural disaster, however, was vastly amplified by two external factors: release of the Stuxnet virus, which shut down control systems in the critical 20 minutes prior to the tsunami; and presence of weapons-grade nuclear materials that devastated the nuclear facility and contaminated the entire region. Of the three parties involved, which bears the greatest guilt? All three are guilty of mass murder, injury and destruction of property on a regional scale, and as such are liable for criminal prosecution and damages under international law and in each respective jurisdiction. The White House, specifically Bush, Cheney and their co-conspirators in the DoE, hold responsibility for ordering the illegal removal and shipment of warheads without safeguards. The state of Israel is implicated in theft from U.S. strategic stockpiles, fraud and extortion against the Japanese government, and a computer attack against critical infrastructure with deadly consequences, tantamount to an act of war. Prime Minister Abe and his Economy Ministry sourced weapons-grade nuclear material in violation of constitutional law and in reckless disregard of the risks of unregulated storage, enrichment and extraction. Had Abe not requested enriched uranium and plutonium in the first place, the other parties would not now be implicated. Japan, thus, bears the onus of the crime. The International Criminal Court has sufficient grounds for taking up a case that involves the health of millions of people in Japan, Canada, the United States, Russia, the Koreas, Mongolia, China and possibly the entire Northern Hemisphere. The Fukushima disaster is more than an human-rights charge against a petty dictator, it is a crime against humanity on par with the indictments at the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals. Failure to prosecute is complicity. If there is a silver lining to every dark cloud, it's that the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami saved the world from even greater folly by halting the drive to World War III.

Pequeños sucios secretos de la Segunda Guerra Mundial o la historía no es tan solo como nos dicen que fué.

Otro buen artículo de www.rense.com

Dirty Little Secrets Of WWII
 The Hidden, Awkward Origins Of World War 2
By Jason Collett
9-6-10

 

The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events: Just consider the following:   Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying "Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war". (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).   Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says "Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish handswhen bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike campsPresident Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for." (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)   Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany 'understandable'. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jewsamong the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jewsthe leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred." (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).   Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin 'said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself' (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).   Is all of this merely attributable to terrible 'anti-semitism'?   The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.   At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H NicholsonPeacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that 'Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.' (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).   As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.   According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):   'It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.   The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press ­ all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the 'Aryans' who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed ­ and lavishly displayed ­ by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle."   Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?   Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the "Jewish Question") essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, 'Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.' But she adds 'Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their "race".. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..' etc etc.   Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. 'Ullstein's was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein's published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein - they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.' (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).   Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes 'In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.'   Mowrer says 'No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..' (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds 'Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.' (pp. 144-5).   Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: 'I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word "Jew", in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.' (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed's bookDisgrace Abounding of the following year he notes 'In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish' (pp238-9).   The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes 'For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.' (Black,The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.   To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, 'The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.' (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah ArendtEichmann in Jerusalem p 7).   Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia's population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):   'It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.   'To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.' Other authors agree with this:   "There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation." (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the 'Jewish Question' Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).   "The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in 'nice society', and 'nice society' included the universities." (Martin Bernal, Black Athenavol. 1 pp. 367, 387).   "The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler's) anti-Semitic beliefs." (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).     Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, "The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all" (p.267), and "Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership" (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist 'who took advantages whenever they offered themselves' (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain's most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:   "He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but 'where there is planing, there are shavings flying'. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church ­ saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the Continent. The return of Germany's colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.." (p 200).   According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia" (p140).   David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to "the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire."   This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.   E-mail comment received:   I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII. The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the ownership of the media, banks and businesses.   Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn't make sense based upon Germany's population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest discussion during my classes.   I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer.   I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast. The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white supremacist.   Thanks again for an excellent article. I am forwarding it to several friends.   JBP

Murió Hitler en 1960

No sé, reza el dicho "Dios los hace y ellos se juntan" pero en muchas y cada vez más de las veces donde platico con alguien incluso sale el tema de Hitler, "un gran líder que descarriló" me cometaron ayer y conste que yo no inicié el tema.

Así en las charlas, así en la TV y medios Hitler presente, el mago y brujo que aún ejerce atracción. un documental reciente en History Channel sobre si Hitler murió o no en Berlín en 1945, ahora un libro...

Como sea, haya muerto o no, el dictador austriaco del pueblo de videntes Braunau Am Inn sigue siendo un personaje notable con muchas, muchas cosas rescatables y muchas más condenables.

Algo que no me gusta es que haya quitado la bandera alemana para montar la de su partido. Imagino eso en México y ¡Buagh! Ver una bandera azul y blanco que nausea, o tricolor con letras o amarillo chillante.


http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1163/749/Nazi_Expert:_I_Have_Proof_Hitler_Died_In_1960s.html

Soros, especulador infecto ahora es empático con los manifestantes en Wall Street

Soros es una bestia especuladora tan repugnante y convenenciera que ahora hasta dice tener simpatía con aquellos que se manifiestan contra toda la podredumbre de lo que el y otros como el representan.

Cometa es atrapado por el sol y se estrella en el

No sé si esté relacionado, hace días reportaron algunos astrónomos aficionados raros objetos cerca del sol y ahora se da esta noticia, seguramente solo es esto, un cometa en ruta suicida hacia el sol.

http://www.theweatherspace.com/news/TWS-100311_nasa-spacecraft-soho.html

Actividad cósmica y solar al alza, allá vamos 2012

Como sea, le hecho es que la actividad solar y cósmica va al alza o al menos esa es la percepción, tal como los mayas vaticinaron.

La mega mancha solar AR1302 emitio hace  unos días una explosión enorme y de muy elevada carga ultravioleta, dichas emisiones no han estado directamente alineadas hacia la tierra pero en los próximos días estará en linea con la Tierra así que una emisión smilar no sabemos que efectos pudiera tener en el planeta. Adicionalmente la mancha AR1302 sigue creciendo y no hay indicios de que deje de acerlo o decrezca en un futuro cercano.

http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2011/09/sunspot-1302-continues-to-turn-toward.html

Invitación a l@s compañer@s progresistas a nuestra marcha.

Estimados compañer@s progresistas;
Favor de Difundir.
  
Necesitamos el apoyo de todos los movimientos y organizaciones autónomas de México, con el propósito de detener la embestida de la Iglesia Católica, el PAN y otros grupos, empecinados en imponer en México una anticonstitucional legislación antiabortista, por medio de legislaciones estatales que reprimen el derecho de las mujeres a disponer libremente de su cuerpo, y a la sociedad imponerle el nacimiento de hijos NO DESEADOS, que frecuentemente son seres desdichados que se unen a la delincuencia. (Estadísticamente está probado que en USA bajo considerablemente los índices de delincuencia, veinte años después de la legalización del aborto en ese país)
 

En México, hay 17 estados de la República que tienen una anticonstitucional legislación que penaliza el aborto. Esta legislación ha sido introducida principalmente por los legisladores del PAN, aunque hay diputados y senadores de todos los partidos que han sido cómplices. Esta legislación es muy peligrosa ya que puede generar mucha muerte, dolor y violencia en contra de las mujeres en los próximos años (talibanización del país)

 

Necesitamos urgentemente el apoyo de los y las ciudadanas conscientes de esta problemática, ya que en estos momentos en la Suprema Corte de Justicia, con la iniciativa del Magistrado Franco, se está decidiendo sobre la inconstitucionalidad de la legislación represora de los derechos de la mujer.

 

Te invitamos a participar en la Gran Marcha que todos y todas haremos el próximo miércoles 28 de Septiembre para apoyar la despenalización del aborto y por la inmediata puesta en libertad de las mujeres injustamente encarceladas por abortar. 

 

TRAYECTO DE LA MARCHA: 

Trayecto: Monumento a la Madre, 16:00 HORAS,  Av. Reforma, Av. Juárez, Madero para llegar al Zócalo

Extrañas partículas más veloces que la velocidad de la luz

Redescubriendo la física y desmitificando a Albert Einstein

Nation & World | Weird particles can travel faster than light, test suggests | Seattle Times Newspaper

Los liberadores de Europa oriental y la Legión Francesa al campo

Federico II de Prusia "El Grande" era rey, militar, filósofo, músico y ahora poeta sexual.

Encontraron un poema perdido, bastante subido de pasión:

http://www.thelocal.de/society/20110915-37615.html

Un vestigio más de Prusia que clama por renacer.


The love which joins them heats their kisses,

And leaves entwined even closer,

Heavenly sensuality! Ruler of the world!

Mother of her pleasures, always fertile springs,

Witness in my verses with your voice,

Her fire, her conduct, the ecstasy of her senses!

Our happy lovers, in their most extreme passion,

In the exuberance of love they knew only themselves,

Kisses, which dissolve in passion, sighing and die,

Arise again in a kiss and become passion again.

Y aquí un pasaje que para Senarclens ilustra la dicotomía sentida por Federico II entre sus labores reales y deseos personales.


Happy, he whose spirit is never decayed by the pomp of power,

And who knew pleasure,

A moment of passion is, for those who enjoy it,

Los muchos seis millones que los judíos siempre dicen que murieron

Desde 1902 ya daban cifras de seis millones, de oprimidos, maltratados o asesinados pero con los nazis si les fraguó esto. Seguramente el número tiene algún significado en su cultura y más en sus intereses.

Auftragstaktik o la superioridad militar táctica pruso-germana

Una sola palabra envuelve mucho más sentido y alcances que un objetivo de misión determinado, encierra todo un pensamiento y filosofía de mando, identificada la necesidad por Federico II de Prusia "El Grande" no fué sino hasta el genio militar de Helmuth Karl Bernhard von Moltke que se formuló como un concepto que más tarde con el ascenso de Moltke pudo ser llevado y probado hasta que en 1888 apareció de forma oficial en el manual de campo del ejército prusiano. No percibido por ingleses y americanos y más difícil aún ser comprendido por cuestiones idiomáticas, "un democrático sistema de mando"  donde quienes están al frente son quienes pueden definir y determinar los alcances y las tácticas, no es raro por esto que a diferencia de otros muchos generales de los viejos ejércitos alemanes morían en el campo de batalla pues dese ahí dominaban la acción y podían definir, redondear, extender,  modificar en sí el alcance de la misión.

Auftragstaktik es sin duda una palabra más de esas al estilo alemán como Schadenfreude o Weltschmerz pero de características más delicadas, que depende como cais siempre en lo alemán de mejor preparación, criterio y también realización, no está libre de fallas pero ofrece ventajas evidentes. Las órdenes giradas por Oberst Kurt Zeitzler para invadir Francia solo fueron, atraviesen completamente las fronteras alemanas, atraviesen completamente la frontera Belga y atraviesen completamente el rio Mosa, así de sencillo... a su vez Heinz Guderian Lieutenant-General bajo su mando simplemente dijo a su XIX Panzerkorps "boleto de tren a la última estación" con ello diciendo que había que llegar hasta los poblados de la costa gala. ¿Sencillo verdad? Y la invasión procedió como ya sabemos.

Aquí dejo un ejemplo en inglés para tratar de entender en qué consiste:

In a hypothetical case an American company commander would get the order to attack and secure a certain village. He would be told to use first platoon to flank the village and third platoon to attempt a frontal assault. Four tanks would be attached to his company to support the frontal assault which would be the main effort. After several hours the company succeeded and the commander radioed back for further orders, the company commander all the while observing the actions from behind.

A German company commander would get the order to secure the village by 1600 hours period. Before the attack he would ensure that even a private knew what was expected of him during the attack. If his platoon commander and sergeant would fall, the enlisted man had to take over. The German company commander might put the allocated tanks on the heights adjacent to the village to provide covering fire or might drive them around the settlement to block the escape of the village defenders. He might take the village by frontal assault, infiltration or pincer attack -- whatever he saw fit the situation best and he would lead the attack that he had devised. After he secured the village he would pursue the remnants of the defenders and push forward with those of his elements who would not be immediately needed because he knew the overall idea of his superior was to attack and within the idea of Auftragstaktik all his actions were covered by the simple order to take the village at 1600 hours. Because of his training a German officer simply did not require detailed instruction.

This guy is coming at the U.S. military from such a different perspective that I am going to ask those who comment to read the twice piece before hitting send on their responses. 

And you thought I was tough on U.S. military education!

By Jörg Muth
Best Defense department of Auftragstaktikaffairs

Auftragstaktik. The word sounds cool even when mangled by an American tongue. What it means, however, has always been elusive to Americans. The problematic translation of that core German military word into "mission type orders" completely distorts its meaning. Auftragstaktik does not denote a certain style of giving orders or a certain way of phrasing them; it is a whole command philosophy.

The idea originates with Frederick the Great, who complained after more than one battle that his highly experienced regimental commanders would not dare take action on their own but too often ask back for orders and thus waste precious time.

Nearly one hundred years later the military genius Helmuth Karl Bernhard Graf von Moltke was the first to formulate the concept of Auftragstaktik. Moltke was a diligent student of Frederick's campaigns, of military history in general and philosophy. At a time when he was not yet famous and, not yet the victor of three wars, he observed the annual General Staff war games in 1858. The paperwork and the detailed orders appalled him because he knew that in war there was no time for such nonsense. During the war game critique he decreed that "as a rule an order should contain only what the subordinate for the achievement of his goals cannot determine on his own." Everything else was to be left to the commander on the spot.

In the following decades, when he rose to the highest rank of the Prussian and then the German Army, Moltke and his disciples promoted the concept in the military. However, the British military writer Basil H. Liddell Hart noted correctly, "that the only thing harder than getting a new idea into a military mind is to get an old one out." Thus Auftragstaktik, not yet known under a single name, was heavily embattled and discussed in German military journals who were then leading in the world. In 1888, the year Moltke retired, it finally manifested itself officially in the field manual of the Prussian Army.

Interestingly, the literally hundreds of American observers who were regularly send to the old continent during the course of the 19th century to study the constantly warring European armies completely missed out on the decade long discussion about the revolutionary command philosophy of Auftragstaktik. Instead they focused on saddle straps, belt buckles and drill manuals. This is one reason why the most democratic command concept never found a home in the greatest democracy. The U.S. officers simply missed the origins because of their own narrow-minded military education.

Auftragstaktik, a command concept in which even the most junior officers were required to make far reaching decisions, demanded a significant change in officer education. In the German Kadettenschulen (cadet schools) hazing was squelched in a short time. The educational reforms for the officer's training in the Prussian/German army, because of the new command philosophy, have so far been overlooked in historiography. An officer had to be taught self-confidence, independent thinking and responsibility and not to be denigrated. In addition the seniority system was not set in stone as at West Point. At a Kadettenschuleyounger cadets could with excellent performance overtake older ones. This, together with the exemplary behavior of the teaching officers, was one of the greatest safe guards against hazing. At West Point no real will ever existed to eradicate it, even though nothing is more harmful to the leadership education of a future officer.

Because the U.S. Army did not possess the command culture of the Germans and Auftragstaktikthe differences of two operations should exemplify this. The instructions for the American Forces to land in North Africa had the size of a Sears Roebuck shopping catalogue.

But when the Germans attacked France Oberst (Colonel) Kurt Zeitzler, then Chief of Staff of Panzergruppe Kleist told to the assembled subordinated commanders of the fast troops and their staff officers: "Gentlemen, I demand that your divisions completely cross the German borders, completely cross the Belgian borders and completely cross the River Meuse. I don't care how you do it, that's completely up to you."

Generalleutnant(Lieutenant-General) Heinz Guderian, commander of XIX Panzerkorps, which was subordinated to Panzergruppe Kleist, gave an even more famous order to his units in the spirit of Auftragstaktik when he told them they all had a "ticket to the last station," which were the respective towns on the French coast. How his troops got there was entirely up to them. As a result the German fast troops made unrivaled progress.

Even after studying the Prussian and German armies for decades, American officers showed a "difficulty interpreting" the concept of Auftragstaktik and most would not come closer to it when they attended the next higher military education institute.

Only a very few American commanders -- George C. Marshall, George S. Patton, Matthew B. Ridgway and Terry de la Mesa Allen -- understood the concept, even though it has never been taught to them in American military schools. In these schools doctrine reigned and not free independent thinking. Doctrine, however, is either based on past wars or on theory and thus can be no guideline for an officer in a present-day conflict.

In World War II the result was a sluggish and almost timid operational and tactical command of most U.S. units with the exception of Patton's Third Army. The dean of U.S. military history, Russell Weigley, noted correctly that when an American commander showed ferociousness or wanted to put "unrelenting pressure" on the enemy he usually had to do so "despite every discouragement from his superiors."

The Germans didn't know such hampering on the tactical level and U.S. intelligence officers noted that 22-year old German lieutenants would command battalions with great success when their superiors had fallen in battle. It is one of the core concepts of Auftragstaktik that the commanding officer is on the frontlines and fights and dies with his men. German generals wounded in battle many times, sporting a close quarter combat badge or a tank destroyer badge, were no rarity in World War II. More than 220 German Generals died in combat in World War II, in contrast to only 10 percent of that number on the American side -- and of these, less than a handful died fighting.

Auftragstaktikis such a core part of the German command culture that until recently no German has ever written a book about it. An American has never done it because it was never understood.

If you have read thus far and still don't know what Auftragstaktik means, here is an example:

In a hypothetical case an American company commander would get the order to attack and secure a certain village. He would be told to use first platoon to flank the village and third platoon to attempt a frontal assault. Four tanks would be attached to his company to support the frontal assault which would be the main effort. After several hours the company succeeded and the commander radioed back for further orders, the company commander all the while observing the actions from behind.

A German company commander would get the order to secure the village by 1600 hours period. Before the attack he would ensure that even a private knew what was expected of him during the attack. If his platoon commander and sergeant would fall, the enlisted man had to take over. The German company commander might put the allocated tanks on the heights adjacent to the village to provide covering fire or might drive them around the settlement to block the escape of the village defenders. He might take the village by frontal assault, infiltration or pincer attack -- whatever he saw fit the situation best and he would lead the attack that he had devised. After he secured the village he would pursue the remnants of the defenders and push forward with those of his elements who would not be immediately needed because he knew the overall idea of his superior was to attack and within the idea of Auftragstaktik all his actions were covered by the simple order to take the village at 1600 hours. Because of his training a German officer simply did not require detailed instruction.

So why the heck did the Germans lose the war if they had such a revolutionary command culture? As the name denotes, Auftragstaktik is a tactical and at most an operational concept, it has no advantage on the strategic level.

The other main reason for the defeat of the Wehrmacht is the sheer boundless arrogance of its officer corps. Being for so long the most famous and prominent group in a nation and admired by their countrymen and international observers alike left its pathological marks. The result became "a persistent tendency of most German Generals to underestimate the size and the quality of the opposing forces."

In the time of greatest crisis the German officer corps became its worst enemy. Traditionally, the most battle experienced officers would gain the highest ranks in the Prussian/German armies, but that had changed with the new officer selection system introduced after the Versailles Treaty. No staff officer who had never even held regimental command, and in the worst case only commanded a desk, would reach the highest ranks. That led to ridiculous situations.

During one of the many desperate situations of the Wehrmacht in August 1942 the Chief of Staff of the Army Generaloberst Franz Halder asked Adolf Hitler to allow units of Army Group North to pull back. The dictator replied that he deemed it not feasible and that "we must hold out in the best interest of the troops." Halder remarked angrily in return that "out there brave rifleman and lieutenants are falling in the thousands as senseless victims" because of Hitler's inflexibility. That, however, caused the dictator to boil over and he screamed at his chief of staff: "What do you want, Herr Halder, you who only, and in the First World War too, sat on the same revolving stool, telling me about the troops, you, who have never once worn the black wound badge?!"

And it was Halder, and not the Dictator Hitler, who basically nullified Auftragstaktikon the Eastern Front because he was no longer able to deal with the independence of the commanders of the fast troops. Hitler just took over the same system after he fired Halder.

All those immense flaws of the Wehrmacht senior officers counterbalanced the excellence in command, tactics and leadership German officers displayed in World War II. The latter explains why the German army was such an outstanding fighting force on the tactical level but still unable to win the war.

Though the mediocre professional military education of the U.S. Army has taken leaps and bounds since those dark times, never has it been attempted to introduce the most effective command philosophy ever invented into the U.S. Army.

An American brigade commander with more than two decades of experience still has to ask his division commander for permission to operate, who in turn asks the corps commander, who in turn asks the theatre commander. The latter two are usually - as it is unfortunate custom in the U.S. Army -- far removed from the battlefield. And decisions are made in an air-conditioned command bunker in Doha about a combat situation in Fallujah -- sometimes the results are merely comical, but sometimes they are fatal.

If the most important verb and the most important noun should be found for the U.S. Army and the Wehrmacht according to the vast amount of manuals, regulations, letters, diaries and autobiographies I have read they would be 'to manage' and 'doctrine' for the U.S. Army and führen (to lead) and Angriff (attack) for the Wehrmacht. Such a comparison alone points out a fundamentally different approach to warfare and leadership.

Because especially in the War on Terror there have been more and more swift actions by small units, a rigid inflexible command system has been hampering the progress of US forces all over the globe. It is time the U.S. Army assesses again its command culture.

Jörg Muth is the author of Command Culture: Officer Education in the U.S. Army and the German Armed Forces, 1901-1940, and the Consequences for World War II. (University of North Texas Press, 2011.)

Se pone más interesante: Marina turca escoltará a otro barco en misión humanitario a Gaza

Interesante, por fín alguien hace frente a la infamia y vómito histórico que día a día hisrael genera en Gaza y los territorios oprimidos de Palestina, si el primer barco con ayuda humanitaria fué abordado y arrasado por la virulenta y paranoide mentalidad judeo-israelí matando a muchos de sus ocupantes y esto no generó condena alguna por parte de otros países y menos un gesto de remordimiento de Israel nunca se disculpó, tal parecce que a Israel se le trata como a alguien traumadito "déjenlo que haga lo quee quiera póbrecito" y crece en asesino serial. Bueno ahora un nuevo barco con ayuda humanitaria sale hacia Gaza acompañado por la marina de guerra turca. Será interesante. A ver si no le llega un virus a los barcos turcos ahora que Israel es un hacker bélico declarado - y tolerado también - y cuando no es por armas es por virus informáticos pero siempre está dañando ese engendro de país.

Turquía que como nación en este sentido no ha cometid crímen alguno sino solo busca defender a estos barcos de ayuda huumanitaria, dicho de otro modo, es inocente, es amenazada por Israel de que este enfermo país en venganza financiará el movimiento rebelde kurdo. Que lógica política tan imbécil.

Definitivamente hay algunos que nunca debieron haber nacido.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/turkish-warships-to-accompany-gaza-aid-convoys-20110910-1k39l.html

Más eventos en el cielo: Una supernova a solo 21 millones de años luz

Como si los mayas hubiesen sabido algo los acontecimientos cósmicos se siguen succediendo unno tras otros, relacionados o no a lo dicho por lso mayas el hecho es que hemos vivido un periodo afortunado:

Una supenova ha sido descubierta a solo 21 millones de años luz por científicos de la Universidad de California y Santa Barbara. Visible en la noche al parecer tan solo con binoculares.

http://www.pm-magazin.de/r/natur/supernova-erleuchtet-weltraum

Alemania esclava de Israel se retira de Durban III, mientras tanto reporte indica que el ataque de Israel a flotilla fué excesivo e irrazonable.

Alemania preocupada pro no elevar el "anti semitismo" se retira de las celebraciones de Durban III una conferencia que extraña pero atinadamente señaló a Israel como un estado racista y peligroso. A la par de esto un nuevo reporte indica que el ataque de Israel a la flotilla de ayuda a palestinos el año pasado fué excesivo e irrazonable.

Alemania preocupada por mimar a un asqueroso país que se comporta como bestia rabiosa o neurótico paranoide - niño golpeado convertido a padre abusador y golpeador - empedernido. No Alemania, no judíos e israelíes el desprecio a Israel no es por conferencias es por sus acciones. ¿Cuando entenderan esto israelíes, judíos y occidentales?

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/video/2011-09/04/c_131096609.htm

Mientras tanto las tensiones con Turquía van en aumento pues esta demanda que Israel se disculpe por su acción bélica excesiva e irrazonable contra la flotilla donde perecieron ciudadanos turcos.

El reporte también condena a Turquía -estupidamente- por no evitar que ciudadanos concientes emprendieran tal acción, es decir permitirle a Israel seguir con su infamia y recomienda a Israel pagar compensaciones a familias afectadas... dinero ¡Carajo! Ni que fueran estos turcos cerdos materialistas queriendo compensar todo con dinero, creo que el panel que redactó esto tuvo una confusión histórica, los que piden dinero por todo, son otros.

Halliburton acusa a British Petroleum de esconder información que hubiera evitado derrame en el Golfo de México

Halliburton demanda a British Petroleum de fraude y difamación y la acusa de ocultar información que pudo haber evitado el trágico derrame en el Golfo de México hace un año.

Entre cerdos (salvajes) capitalistas te veas.

http://www.chron.com/business/energy/article/Halliburton-BP-Hid-info-that-might-have-2153702.php

Profetas el Armagedon, análisis sobre causas reales para la debacle de la civilización occidental.

Un interesante documental de History Channel que no solo atañe a E.U.A. sino a todo el hemisferio y al planeta mismo.

Son bastantes partes, véanlas todas, vale la pena.