Colaborador cercano a Julian Assange lo describe como paraníco, obsesionado con el poder y maniático.

Con todo y todo Assange no es el personaje que muchos se han imaginado. Sin embargo sirve en algunos aspectos en otros no, menso si le direon dinero los israelíes para que no publicara cosas inocómodas.

Reciente entrevista en Stern a Domescheit-Berg, programador alemán de WikiLeaks llamado "El Arquitecto" muestra los claro-oscuros de Assange.

WikiLeaks raramente amable e inocuo hacia Israel. ¿Se vendió Assange con Israel como hace tiempo aquí lo sugerí?

En una nota que curiosamente hace eco de mi primer presentimiento sobre WikiLeaks, antes del revuelo que la cacería y captura de Assange generaría y de que fuese un acto de "buena" conciencia apoyar ciegamente a WikiLeaks, en ese antes, previo a la exhibición de documentos de los embajadores de Estados Unidos tuve la impresión dando un ligero vistazo a WikiLeaks que algo estaba mal, mucha inmundicia de todas partes pero sobre uno de los drenajes más espesos y pestilentes del mundo no había gran cosa. ¿Exoneró o negoció Assange con la basura sionista Israelí?

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=15770

WikiLeaks ‘struck a deal with Israel’ over diplomatic cables leaks

By wmw_admin on December 9, 2010


by LikiWeaks – Indybay.org December 7, 2010

We should obviously all support WikiLeaks and its founder and spokesperson, Julian Assange, who has just been arrested in Britain, in this dirty war by states around the globe against transparency and openness. But in the world of politics, sadly, things are never as innocent as they appear. According to new revelations, Assange had allegedly struck a deal with Israel before the recent ‘cable gate’, which may explain why the leaks “were good for Israel,” as the Israeli prime minister put it.

A number of commentators, particularly in Turkey and Russia, have been wondering why the hundreds of thousands of American classified documents leaked by the website last month did not contain anything that may embarrass the Israeli government, like just about every other state referred to in the documents. The answer appears to be a secret deal struck between the WikiLeaks “heart and soul”, as Assange humbly described himself once [1], with Israeli officials, which ensured that all such documents were ‘removed’ before the rest were made public.

According to an Arabic investigative journalism website [2], Assange had received money from semi-official Israeli sources and promised them, in a “secret, video-recorded agreement,” not to publish any document that may harm Israeli security or diplomatic interests.

The sources of the Al-Haqiqa report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers who have left the organisation in the last few months over Assange’s “autocratic leadership” and “lack of transparency.”

In a recent interview with the German daily Die Tageszeitung, former WikiLeaks spokesperson Daniel Domscheit-Berg said he and other WikiLeaks dissidents are planning to launch their own whistleblowers’ platform to fulfil WikiLeaks’s original aim of “limitless file sharing.” [3]

Mr Domscheit-Berg, who is about to publish a book about his days ‘Inside WikiLeaks’, accuses Assange of acting as a “king” against the will of others in the organisation by “making deals” with media organisations that are meant to create an explosive effect, which others in WikiLeaks either know little or nothing about. [4]

Furthermore, Assange’s eagerness for headline-grabbing scoops meant that WikiLeaks had not been able to ‘restructure’ itself to cope with this surge of interest, insiders add. This has meant that smaller leaks, which might be of interest to people at a local level, are now being overlooked for the sake of big stories. [5]

According to the Al-Haqiqa sources, Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, where removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added.

Indeed, the published documents seem to have a ‘gap’ stretching over the period of July – September 2006, during which the 33-day Lebanon war took place. Is it possible that US diplomats and officials did not have any comments or information to exchange about this crucial event but spent their time ‘gossiping’ about every other ‘trivial’ Middle-Eastern matter?

Following the leak (and even before), Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had “worked in advance” to limit any damage from leaks, adding that “no classified Israeli material was exposed by WikiLeaks.” [6] In an interview with the Time magazine around the same time, Assange praised Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness! [7]

According to another report [8], a left-leaning Lebanese newspaper had met with Assange twice and tried to negotiate a deal with him, offering “a big amount of money”, in order to get hold of documents concerning the 2006 war, particularly the minutes of a meeting held at the American embassy in Beirut on 24th July 2006, which is widely considered as a ‘war council’ meeting between American, Israeli and Lebanese parties that played a role in the war again Hizbullah and its allies. The documents the Al-Akhbar editors received, however, all date to 2008 onwards and do not contain “anything of value,” the sources confirm. This only goes to support the Israel deal allegations.

Finally, it might be worth pointing out that Assange might have done what he is alleged to have done in order protect himself and ensure that the leaked documents are published so as to expose the American hypocrisy, which he is said to be obsessed with “at the expense of more fundamental aims.”
Notes:
[1] http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/09/wikileaks-revolt/
[2] http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/977/36/
[3] http://www.taz.de/1/netz/netzpolitik/artikel/1/vom-hacker-zum-popstar/
[4] http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,732212,00.html
[5] http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,719619,00.html
[6] http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-wikileaks-revelations-were-good-for-israel-1.327773
[7] http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2034040-2,00.html
[8] http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/986/36/

Julian Assange... capturado

No hay mucho qué decir sobre esto, solo el marcar loq ue sucede cuando alguien incomoda al gobierno mundial, sí, ese que algunos se mofan y dicen que no existe, Lassange tuvo primero una discreta orden judicial en contra en Australia, luego cargos en otro lado, posteriormente Paypal le niega el poder cobrar aportaciones, Suiza también le congela dinero.

Ese trato ni el temido narcotraficante "Chapo" Guzmán lo tiene pues este último hasta tiene el privilegio de aparecer, siendo delincuente declarado, en el listado de hombres más ricos del Forbes. 

Queda claro que puedes ser asesino, traficante, pero nunca seas un "delincuente" que atente contra los estados y el gobierno mundial, pues ese sí será cazado como nadie.

Los primeros WikiLeaks sobre México

El cable de WikiLeaks que expone que el Presidente mexicano llegó a sospechar que Hugo Chávez financió la campaña del perredista, desata reacción de López Obrador en Twitter
20:29

• EU desconfía de México por corrupción: WikiLeaks 18:13
• Galván quería estado de excepción: WikiLeaks 17:50
• Clinton, preocupada por estrés de Calderón 17:35
• EU cuestiona labor de Ejército: WikiLeaks 17:10
• Ejército, lento en caída de Beltrán: WikiLeaks 16:36
• WikiLeaks revela 1eros informes sobre México 15:51

• Cable sobre la preocupación de EU por la situación de México
• Cable sobre la preocupación de Calderón por intromisiones de Chávez
• Cable sobre la ayuda de EU en la lucha contra el narcotráfico
• Cable sobre intención del jefe del Ejército de establecer un estado de excepción en algunas zonas

Wikileaks revela documentos de embajadores y diplomáticos de EUA alrededor del mundo: Si sale esta semana no olvide su paragua lloverá inmundicia.

• Si a alguien ha alertado y puesto en aviso el gobierno de EUA, casi en tono de disculpa sobre esta fuga de información es a oficiales del gobierno Israelí, como a pocos si no es que como a nadie, queda claro quien es el proxeneta de la golfa en casona blanca de Pennsilvanya Av, Washington D.C.
• A Ahmadinejad, presidnete iraní por su retórica y nada más ya le colgaron millones de muertitos, el gobierno de EUA dice simplemente que "es Hitler".
• El secretario de exteriores alemán comentado en diplomático lenguaje es calificado en lenguaje simple como tonto e insustancial.
• Para variar el sitio web de Wikileaks está fuera de linea.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,731580,00.html
http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=197115

¿Por fin? Wikileaks evidenciara el puerquerío israleí-sionista junto a su aliado Estados Unidos

Ya esperaba esto, antes tenía mis sospechas del aclamado Wikileaks, exhibir podredumbre y no hablar ni mencionar a Israel era simplemente incongruente, pero al parecer esto va a cambiar. A temblar ¿Ahora si?
 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5grii3RHb-D4QHemnerLxMYPO_L6Q?docId=CNG.25177ec61aed2bd3050d3e2b8bda84d2.311

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=196889

US warns Israel of WikiLeaks release

(AFP) – 2 hours ago

JERUSALEM — Washington has warned its ally Israel of potential embarrassment from the expected release of US diplomatic cables on whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks, an Israeli newspaper said on Thursday.

A senior Israeli official, quoted in Haaretz, said it has been informed that WikiLeaks plans to release hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables, some of which could include confidential reports from the US embassy in Tel Aviv.

"The Americans said they view the leak very seriously," he told the paper, on condition of anonymity.

"They don't know when they will be released on the Internet and what exactly they say, but they didn't want us to read about it in the newspapers," the Israeli official said.

Embassy spokesman Kurt Hoyer, contacted by AFP, declined to comment except to say that such leaks could put lives at risk.

"The cables date from the past five years and include media reports, talks with politicians, government officials and journalists, as well as evaluations and various analyses by American diplomats regarding their host countries," according to Haaretz.

Yigor Palmor, spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry, said the ministry did not comment in public on diplomatic exchanges.

The State Department said on Wednesday that US embassies around the world had "begun the process of informing governments that a release of documents is possible in the near future."

"These revelations... are going to create tensions on our relationships between our diplomats and our friends around the world," said State Department spokesman Philip Crowley.

WikiLeaks has not said what will be contained in its coming release, indicating only it will be "seven times" the Iraq War logs in which it posted 400,000 secret documents.

Wikileaks: La enciclopedia en linea de actos condenables pero ¿ Es Wikileaks es otro instrumento de judeo-sionistas-israelíes ?

Wikileaks es referido cada vez más, por lo pronto he adquirido más noción de ella pues la encuentro referida más frecuentemente. ¿ Acaso servirá o será imparcial ?

Es una enciclopedia autogestiva/publica donde se dan a conocer documentos y archivos filtrados de gobiernos o compañias y donde se evidencían sus malos actos y procederes condenables.

http://wikileaks.org/

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:Analysis_requested

Algunos artículos:

U.S. Intelligence planned to destroy WikiLeaks, 18 Mar 2008  

Unconventional Warfare in the 21st century : US surrogates, terrorists and narcotrafficers

Pero algo me hizo dudar ya de la calidad de este sitio, si uno busca: zionism, Israel o jews no aparecen referencias mayores, ni documentos sobre sus porquerías y asesinatos y mafias, peor aun al momento de escribir esto y buscar Israel war crimes no aparece una referencia solida o sustancial, aparece Bosnia u otros casos pero no Israel.

No puedo concluir pero si conjeturar que este sitio es otro más dominado y bajo revisión de la esfera judeo sionista.